Remote Gambling Licence
- Topical Issues
- 2020
- Protecting children in the online and social media age
- Covid-19
- TravelTech
- Work in Progress
- 2019
- Predictions 2020
- Taxing tech
- Regulating the internet
- Future mobility
- Fashion and luxury retail 2019
- Video games update
- BodyTech
- Privacy: there's more to it than GDPR
2018- Predictions 2019
- Digital Single Market 2018 update
- Proptech
- The future of media
- AI
- Fintech 2018
- Startups and VCs
- Sportech 2018
- Cybersecurity and data breaches
- Games and eGaming update
Topical Issues Archive
- News and Events
Class 3 Remote Gaming Licence – this license is for operators who organise player to player games but they do not partake in the risk and receive only a commission. This license is suitable for betting exchange providers, pools and poker rooms. Class 3 on 4 Remote Gaming Licence - shall be a licence to promote and abet gaming from Malta. The Commission has published guidance on remote gambling licences that states that to obtain a licence to operate remote gambling from Jersey a provider must either be (i) incorporated in the island; or (ii) genuinely operate gambling from a server based on the island. The Licensee is deemed to commence activity upon acquiring the gambling license. Any changes to the gaming equipment, such as rules of the game or any other intended divergences from the original remote gaming license application must be submitted to the Authority for approval. An operating permit for gambling is issued separately for organising a type or a subtype of gambling as remote gambling. An operating permit for remote gambling is issued for up to five years. In order to obtain an operating permit for remote gambling, an application indicating the following shall be submitted to the Estonian Tax and Customs Board. Any company offering remote gambling services using 'gambling equipment' (which is defined as anything used in the provision of facilities for gambling) located in the UK must obtain a remote gambling licence. 'Remote gambling' is defined as gambling in which persons participate by the use of 'remote communication'.
< Back
The UK gambling industry received a controversial overhaul when the Gambling Act 2005 (the 'Act') was fast-tracked through Parliament. At the time, media and public attention focused on changes that paved the way for so called 'super-casinos' to be built in the UK.
However, the Act also introduced a number of other important changes for the sector including a new regulator in the form of the Gambling Commission, new codes governing socially responsible TV and radio advertising, extensive changes to the regulation of gambling, betting and lotteries and, for the first time, a specific regulatory system for online and other forms of remote gambling.
The super-casino debate was abruptly set aside four years ago when Prime Minister Gordon Brown scrapped the proposed Manchester super-casino. For companies offering remote gambling services to UK customers, the attention is now on proposed changes to the Act that could bring many more companies under the UK remote licensing regime.
A twenty-first Century upgrade
The previous Gaming Act 1968 prevented the establishment within the UK of online or other remotely operated casinos. Those companies offering remote gambling services to UK customers were therefore based abroad. It was widely agreed that new legislation was needed to promote and regulate remote gambling in the UK whilst protecting customers.
One of the updates introduced under the new legislation was a separate licence for remote gambling, and part of the new Gambling Commission’s role was to grant licences to organisations able to meet the licensing objectives. These objectives are stated to be central to the overall purpose of the Act:
- preventing gambling from being a source of crime or disorder, being associated with crime or disorder or being used to support crime;
- ensuring that gambling is conducted in a fair and open way; and
- protecting children and other vulnerable persons from being harmed or exploited by gambling.
Any company offering remote gambling services using 'gambling equipment' (which is defined as anything used in the provision of facilities for gambling) located in the UK must obtain a remote gambling licence. 'Remote gambling' is defined as gambling in which persons participate by the use of 'remote communication'. This definition expressly includes internet, telephone, television or radio communication and also has a catch-all provision for 'any other kind of electronic or other technology for facilitating communication'. The idea was to 'future-proof' the definition against further developments in technology. The Secretary of State may also clarify in regulations that a specific system or method of communication is, or is not, to be treated as a form of 'remote communication'.
The great offshore migration
Some commentators (and no doubt HMRC) hoped that the introduction of the Act would serve as encouragement for offshore operators to relocate to the UK given that there was a feeling in the industry that customers would be happier to provide their credit card details to gambling websites within the UK. However, the years that followed did not see a movement of remote gambling companies to the UK and indeed many of the operators based in the UK at the time the Act was introduced have since relocated abroad.
The main drive behind the migration to offshore jurisdictions has been financial. Operators found that it was possible for them to avoid the UK’s 15% tax on remote gaming profits without materially affecting their services by restructuring certain parts of their operations offshore. The Act provides that operators licensed in the European Economic Area (EEA), including Gibraltar, or a ‘white-listed’ country (which at the date of this article are Alderney, the Isle of Man, Tasmania and Antigua) do not also need a UK licence to advertise and offer their services into the UK provided that they do not have any remote gambling equipment in the UK. As such, the usual practice for online gaming companies is now to set up all of their gambling equipment in tax efficient white-listed jurisdictions, whilst maintaining a presence in the UK by, for example, locating their marketing team here. This set up is perfectly legal under the Act, provided that the gaming operator is licenced in the EEA or a white-listed jurisdiction.
As the operator pays tax where the bet is struck (i.e. where the bet is accepted), not where it is placed, the potential cost saving for the operator is substantial. By way of example, operators who have set up their gambling equipment in Alderney will not pay any betting/gaming duty (although they will need to pay a licence fee to the relevant licensing authority, in this example the Alderney Gambling Control Commission). The same set up in the UK would mean paying a licence fee and also paying the UK remote gaming duty of 15% of profits.
The future: time to shift focus?
Concerns over the remote licensing system were raised at the time the Act was introduced and have persisted since. The then Sport Minister Gerry Sutcliffe commenced a review of the regime in early 2010 expressing concern that “for many reasons, increasingly few companies active in the British Market are now regulated by the commission.” The current government is discussing proposals to change the focus of the system so that anyone who provides remote gambling services to UK customers will need a licence, regardless of where they are based. Whilst the details are yet to be decided, offshore operators should brace themselves for an increase in their tax payments.
An article on the proposed reforms to the remote gambling regime features alongside this article in this month’s Download.
If you have any questions on this article please contact us.
Related articles
'Concerns over the remote licensing system were raised at the time the Act was introduced and have persisted since. '
We have the Remote Gambling Software licence, which enables us to create and develop digital solutions for the UK gambling industry.
In 2014, the UK Gambling Commission introduced changes to gambling regulations, meaning that from April 2015, “all gambling software used by the licensee must have been manufactured by the holder of a gambling software operating license”. This requirement affects all holders of remote (online) casino, bingo and betting licenses who must all use licensed providers.
To be able to carry on our legacy of developing innovative and engaging products for the UK gambling industry, we secured a Remote Gambling Software licence in March 2015. We are very proud to have been awarded this licence as it demonstrates that our products are built to a high standard of quality with a close eye on stopping any potential security implications, both of which are requirements of the UK Gambling Commission.
Technical Standards
Remote Gambling Licence App
As a licensed gambling development company, this gives us the authority to “manufacture, supply, install or adapt gambling software” for the UK and Ontario gambling industry.
This means that we must adhere to a strict set of technical standards outlined by the UK Gambling Commission. These cover a range of topics including but not limited to:
- Display of transactions
- Access to rules
- Responsible product design
- Display of customer account information
In addition, we adhere to stringent testing strategy procedures for all gambling products to ensure that they are fit for purpose and tested to a high standard.
Information Security
Remote Gambling Licence Uk
Our Remote Gambling Software licence requires that we meet the standards of ISO 27001:2013. Therefore, we’ve tightened our internal security policies, processes and procedures, and provided training for all staff members on the importance of information security.
This means that security is at the forefront of what we do for all of our clients, both within the gambling industry.